Background: A conventional lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was compared to the commercially available MELISA (memory lymphocyte immunostimulation assay), a lymphoproliferative assay that has been suggested to be a valuable instrument for the diagnosis of metal allergy. Sensitivity and specificity of the two assays were calculated using a patch test as a reference method.

Methods: 34 patients were patch-tested for gold sodium thiosulfate, palladium chloride and nickel sulfate, and the lymphocyte proliferation to these metals was tested in vitro using mononuclear cells from peripheral blood.

Results: No significant differences regarding sensitivity and specificity were found between MELISA and conventional LTT. The sensitivity varied between 55 and 95% and the specificity between 17 and 79%.

Conclusions: The low specificity of the two in vitro assays suggests that they are not useful for diagnosis of contact allergy to the metals gold, palladium and nickel, since a large number of false-positive results will be obtained.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000237456DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lymphocyte proliferation
8
patch test
8
gold palladium
8
palladium nickel
8
sensitivity specificity
8
vitro lymphocyte
4
proliferation compared
4
compared patch
4
test gold
4
nickel background
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!