Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of nitric oxide (NO) on diaphragmatic fatigue in fifteen anaesthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs, divided into three groups. The animals were pre-treated with indomethacin (3 mg kg-1, i.v.) to block the cyclo-oxygenase pathway. To group 1 pigs (n = 6) NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 5 mg kg-1 i.v.) was administered as a bolus to block endogenous NO production, while group 2 pigs (n = 6) were infused with sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 0.023 mg kg-1, i.v.), a donor of NO. Group 3 pigs (n = 3) were used as the controls. We evaluated diaphragmatic strength by measuring the transdiaphragmatic pressure (P di) generated during bilateral phrenic nerve stimulation at 10, 20, 30 and 50 Hz, 15 V, while the diaphragmatic endurance was assessed by a 30s stimulation at 10 Hz, 15 V. Diaphragmatic index was assessed as the ratio of peak force between single twitches performed before and after the 30 s stimulation west. We also evaluated mean systemic (MAP) and pulmonary (MPAP) arterial pressures, pulmonary wedge pressure (PW), systemic (SVR) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and cardiac output (CO). L-NAME increased MAP, MPAP, PW, SVR and PVR, but decreased CO. SNP caused a decrease in MAP, MPAP, PW and SVR, while PVR and CO did not change. The main finding of this study was that diaphragmatic strength was not significantly weakened after L-NAME administration, except at 10 Hz, while it did not change after SNP infusion. However, both L-NAME and SNP caused significant decreases in diaphragmatic endurance capacity. The fatigue appearing after L-NAME is probably correlated with a decline in diaphragmatic blood flow, as evidenced by the increase in SVR and the decrease in CO, and consequently in oxygen supply. In contrast, the decrease in endurance capacity after SNP infusion can be attributed to a direct action of NO on skeletal muscle.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.1997.sp004018 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!