A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Screening for depression in diabetes using the Beck Depression Inventory. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for screening major depression among diabetic patients.
  • The research involved 172 diabetic outpatients, evaluating their BDI scores and comparing them with a diagnostic standard to determine the presence of depression.
  • Results indicated that the BDI effectively differentiated between depressed and non-depressed individuals, with a cutoff score of 16 showing optimal sensitivity and predictive value for diagnosing major depression in this population.

Article Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) as a screening tool for major depression in diabetes.

Method: One hundred seventy-two diabetic outpatients (insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [IDDM] = 59, or non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [NIDDM] = 113) being evaluated for a treatment trial were studied. BDI scores were calculated for the complete 21-item measure as well as for the cognitive (13 items) and somatic (eight items) symptom subgroups. The presence of depression was determined using the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R) criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to evaluate the performance of the screening test in relation to the diagnostic standard.

Results: Depressed subjects were effectively discriminated from nondepressed subjects by using the full 21-item BDI, the cognitive items alone, or the somatic items alone (p < .001 for each comparison), although the cognitive items were more effective than the somatic items (p < .0005). BDI total scores between 12 and 14 inclusive displayed the best balance between sensitivity (0.90-0.82) and specificity (0.84-0.89), but a cutoff score > or = 16 for the entire 21-item measure exhibited the best balance between sensitivity and positive predictive value when prediction values were extrapolated to a diabetic population with a depression prevalence rate of 20%. This cutoff score would capture > 70% of the patients diagnosed with major depression yet provide > 70% certainty that a person screening positive actually has the psychiatric disorder.

Conclusion: The BDI is an effective screening test for major depression in diabetic patients. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the test's precise performance characteristics in the general clinical setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199701000-00004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

major depression
12
cognitive items
12
somatic items
12
beck depression
8
depression inventory
8
diabetes mellitus
8
21-item measure
8
items somatic
8
screening test
8
best balance
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!