AI Article Synopsis

  • The study followed children who participated in a clinical trial for low-birthweight premature infants to assess their development at age 8.
  • The trial divided participants into intervention and follow-up groups, providing services like home visits and developmental center support for the first three years.
  • Results showed that while cognitive and academic outcomes were similar for both groups in lighter LBW cases, the intervention group had significantly better outcomes in several measures of IQ and academic performance in heavier LBW cases.

Article Abstract

Objective: To reevaluate at age 8 years children who had participated during the first 3 years of life in a randomized clinical trial of special services for low-birthweight (LBW) premature infants.

Design: Follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of premature infants (< or = 37 weeks' gestation), stratified by 2 LBW groups (lighter [< or = 2000 g] and heavier [2001-2500 g]) and divided into intervention (n=377) and follow-up only (n=608) groups.

Setting: Eight sites serving diverse populations.

Participants: At age 8 years, 874 children were assessed: 336 in the intervention group and 538 in the follow-up only group.

Intervention: The 3-year intervention consisted of home visits (birth to 3 years), child development center services (ages 1 to 3 years), and parent group meetings (ages 1 to 3 years).

Primary Outcome Measures: Cognitive functioning (Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children-III; Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised); academic achievement (Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement-Revised); and parental reports of school performance, behavior (Child Behavior Checklist), and health (Child General Health Survey).

Results: At age 8 years, in the entire cohort and in the lighter LBW stratum, the intervention and follow-up only groups were similar on all primary outcome measures. Differences favoring the intervention group were found within the heavier LBW group: full-scale IQ score (4.4 points higher, P=.007), verbal IQ score (4.2 points higher, P=.01), performance IQ score (3.9 points higher, P=.02), mathematics achievement score (4.8 points higher, P=.04), and receptive vocabulary score (6.7 points higher, P=.001). On a physical functioning subscale, the whole intervention group received less favorable ratings, while the lighter LBW intervention group had lower maternal ratings assessing social limitations caused by behavior.

Conclusion: Although at age 8 years there were modest intervention-related differences in the cognitive and academic skills of heavier LBW premature children, attenuation of the large favorable effects seen at 3 years was observed in both the heavier and lighter LBW groups. This indicates a need to develop additional intervention strategies for LBW premature children that can provide sustained benefits.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

age years
20
score points
20
points higher
20
intervention group
16
lbw premature
12
lighter lbw
12
intervention
9
premature infants
8
years
8
lbw
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!