Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The optimal treatment for recurrent stones of the biliary tract in patients previously treated by hepatic-jejunal anastomosis with Roux en Y loop is debated and the criteria are not fully defined. Age, cardiopulmonary diseases, diabetes, multiple previous surgery of the biliary tract, size, number, and type of stones are some of the factors to evaluate before choosing the most convenient approach. We present two high surgical risk patients with recurrent biliary tract stones previously treated with hepatic-jejunal anastomosis and Roux en Y loop, and treated successfully. Percutaneous lithotripsy was used and in one extracorporeal lithotripsy was associated. These techniques offered a good treatment for these patients, but we must consider the high cost of these procedures. The criteria to choose the best option should consider the risk factors and the cost effectiveness of the various possibilities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!