Purpose: To determine and compare the minimum required radiation exposure for a.-p. abdominal radiographs with digital luminescence radiography (DLR) and a screen-film system (SFS) providing adequate image quality in clinical routine.

Material And Method: Abdominal radiographs a.-p. of a pig were produced with DLR and SFS systematically varying the tube current-time product. The image quality was assessed by eight experienced radiologists according to the criteria of visual resolution, mean optical density, perceptibility of the lateral edge of the psoas, the caudal edge of the liver, bone structures and intestinal wall.

Results: The image quality of the digital radiographs was better for each criterion except visual resolution if the same current-time product was used for both techniques. From the minimum tube current-time products providing an adequate image quality it follows that a dose reduction of 57% can be achieved by applying DLR instead of speed class 200 SFS.

Conclusion: The recently published guide-lines for quality assurance in x-ray diagnostics issued by the German Federal Board of Physicians recommend using speed class 400 SFS. Since in that case an approximately halved radiation dose is necessary, dose reduction is hardly to be expected with DLR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1015774DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image quality
16
digital luminescence
8
luminescence radiography
8
screen-film system
8
abdominal radiographs
8
providing adequate
8
adequate image
8
tube current-time
8
current-time product
8
visual resolution
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!