Background And Aims Of The Study: Pericardial xenografts were introduced for clinical use following evidence of their good hemodynamic characteristics in laboratory tests; however, their efficiency in comparison with porcine valves has not been fully assessed. Pericarbon, a new type of pericardial bioprosthesis, has been recently developed in order to provide better hemodynamic performances and longer durability than such bioprostheses currently in use.
Methods: Fifteen patients operated on for aortic valve replacement with a 23 mm Pericarbon and a sex- and age-matched group operated on with a 23 mm Hancock II bioprosthesis were submitted to echocardiographic and Doppler examinations in order to compare the hemodynamic performance of the two devices.
Results: Peak transvalvular gradients for Pericarbon and Hancock II bioprostheses (38.9 +/- 13.0 vs. 33.9 +/- 13.0 mmHg; p = 0.294) and mean transvalvular gradients (24.7 +/- 7.6 vs. 20.8 +/- 9.9 mmHg, p = 0.24) showed no significant difference. However, the indexed effective prosthetic dynamic area was significantly larger for the Hancock II device (0.73 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.62 +/- 0.13 cm2; p < 0.05).
Conclusions: When installed as 23 mm pericardial bioprostheses, the Pericarbon device appears not to demonstrate superior hemodynamic performance to that of the Hancock II; however, additional studies are needed to provide a definitive conclusion.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
November 2022
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of the transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves with transcatheter aortic valves.
Methods: This retrospective study enrolled all consecutive patients who were considered high risk for reoperations by the heart team and who underwent transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthetic valves in Tehran Heart Center, Tehran, Iran. All the procedures were performed via the transfemoral venous route under echocardiography and fluoroscopy guidance with Edwards SAPIEN transcatheter heart valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA).
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)
October 2004
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pericardial valve bioprostheses were introduced in early 1970s and were widely used in the 1980s. The longterm results with the Ionescu-Shiley valve, the first commercially available pericardial valve, were disappointing because of high rate cusp tears during the first decade after implantation. The enthusiasm for this type of bioprosthetic valve was further hampered by the premature failure of the Hancock pericardial valve.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Cardiothorac Surg
February 1999
Center for Experimental Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Division of Experimental Cardiac Surgery, Leuven, Belgium.
Objective: To compare calcification characteristics of two porcine stentless valves (Toronto SPV and Freestyle) with different designs, fixation and antimineralization techniques using a juvenile sheep model of valve implantation inside the circulation.
Methods: The stentless valves (n = 2 x 6) were implanted in juvenile sheep in the pulmonary artery as an interposition, while the circulation was maintained with a right ventricular assist device. The model was validated by the implantation of, clinically well-known, porcine (Hancock II) and pericardial (Pericarbon) valves.
J Heart Valve Dis
November 1996
Department of Cardiac Surgery, S. Maria dei Battuti General Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
Background And Aims Of The Study: Pericardial xenografts were introduced for clinical use following evidence of their good hemodynamic characteristics in laboratory tests; however, their efficiency in comparison with porcine valves has not been fully assessed. Pericarbon, a new type of pericardial bioprosthesis, has been recently developed in order to provide better hemodynamic performances and longer durability than such bioprostheses currently in use.
Methods: Fifteen patients operated on for aortic valve replacement with a 23 mm Pericarbon and a sex- and age-matched group operated on with a 23 mm Hancock II bioprosthesis were submitted to echocardiographic and Doppler examinations in order to compare the hemodynamic performance of the two devices.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!