Advertising, computers, and pharmacy liability. A Michigan court's decision has ramifications for pharmaceutical care.

J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash)

Department of Clinical Sciences and Administration, University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Tex, USA.

Published: November 1996

Arbor Drugs, Inc., advertised that its computer could detect dangerous drug interactions. A pharmacist failed to warn a patient accordingly and the patient suffered a stroke as a result of an interaction between tranylcypromine and a decongestant. The Michigan Court of Appeals held that this failure to warn was actionable under the theories of negligence and fraud as well as under the Michigan Consumer Protection Act. The court's basic message is that pharmacies may be held legally responsible for preventing harm when they represent themselves as being capable of doing so.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

advertising computers
4
computers pharmacy
4
pharmacy liability
4
liability michigan
4
michigan court's
4
court's decision
4
decision ramifications
4
ramifications pharmaceutical
4
pharmaceutical care
4
care arbor
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!