Previous studies of the accuracy of pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) which provide continuous cardiac output (CCO) monitoring have investigated the performance during steady-state conditions. We compared the response time to hemodynamic change using a CCO PAC and an ultrasonic flow probe (UFP). In five sheep, a CCO PAC was inserted, and an UFP for measurement of CCO was placed around the pulmonary artery via a left thoracotomy. Six interventions which rapidly alter cardiac output were studied: crystalloid bolus, balloon inflation in the inferior vena cava (IVC), IVC balloon deflation, dobutamine infusion, hemorrhage, and reinfusion of blood. Cardiac output measured before and after each intervention was used to calculate the total change caused by the intervention, and the time intervals from intervention to 20%, 50%, and 80% of that change were noted. For all interventions, the time response of CCO was significantly slower than UFP. The largest differences were seen with the rapid infusion of lactated Ringer's solution for which the time interval for 20% change was 7.3 +/- 2.3 min (mean +/- SD) for CCO versus 0.5 +/- 0.3 min for UFP. The time interval for 80% change was 14.5 +/- 4.1 min for CCO versus 1.8 +/- 0.9 min with UFP. The current study demonstrates clinically important time delays in the response of the CCO catheter. This delay must be considered when rapid alterations of the hemodynamic state may occur.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199612000-00007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac output
16
+/- min
16
pulmonary artery
12
time response
8
continuous cardiac
8
cco
8
cco pac
8
80% change
8
response cco
8
time interval
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!