Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Intraspinal narcotic analgesia (INA) has been used for chronic pain from nonmalignant causes with moderate success. To ascertain the efficacy of the morphine pump, we reviewed the 2-year results of continuous INA in 18 patients with failed back syndrome or arachnoiditis and intractable, debilitating pain that was unrelieved by conventional means. All patients underwent a trial screening of single-dose intrathecal narcotics with good pain relief. After 2 years, 8 pumps were still functioning, 8 patients had the pump removed or turned off, and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. Our patients averaged 1.4 additional procedures or hospitalizations after initial pump insertion. Overall, only 4 patients had objective evidence of benefit from INA, for a success rate of 25%. Results of this review suggest INA should not be used for the long-term management of chronic pain from nonmalignant causes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!