The clinical evaluation exercise (CEX), a direct observation of trainees' clinical skills, is a common method of house officer evaluation. During our studies of its reliability, the extent of the CEX's didactic value surfaced. This brief report describes the amount of information passed from the evaluator to the house officer in 73 CEXs. On average, evaluators made eight teaching points in postexamination sessions. However, there were as many points recorded on the CEX forms that evaluators never mentioned. In a subset of CEXs carried out with two observers present, agreement in the teaching points presented to the house officer within the pairs witnessing the same examination was 18%. Positive feedback constituted 9% to 12% of the points presented. Our observations suggest that the more systematic feedback mechanisms may enhance the didactic value of the CEX.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02599606 | DOI Listing |
BMJ
June 2014
Global Public Health Unit, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, UK.
Successive UK governments have actively supported the expansion of alcohol exports. and explore the implicit tensions between national economic interests and global health goals
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!