A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The impact of pulse generator longevity on the long-term costs of cardiac pacing. | LitMetric

The impact of pulse generator longevity on the long-term costs of cardiac pacing.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

Division of Cardiology, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Published: October 1996

The long-term costs of cardiac pacing include the device costs, the procedural costs, the follow-up costs, and the replacement costs. At present, there is significant variability in the efficiencies of the integrated circuits and the total battery capacity among different pulse generators that will influence replacement rates over time. Accordingly, we compared the influence of pulse generator longevity on the long-term costs of pacing. The longevity of pulse generators was calculated based on the electrical characteristics of the device and the percentage of time the patient is paced. Replacement rates of pulse generators were estimated for our patient population over a 20-year period, based on patient survival and pulse generator longevity. The costs of pacing over this 20-year follow-up period were then calculated. The longevity of DDDR devices presently implanted in the United States ranges from 8-14 years, assuming that patients are paced 50% of the time. Replacement rates in this population over a 20-year follow-up period were calculated to range from 0.34-0.66, and the total costs of pacing would range from $11,898-14,900 per patient. The longevity of SSIR devices ranges from 7-20 years, assuming that patients are paced 50% of the time. Replacement rates were calculated over the 20-year follow-up period to range from 0.20-0.84, and the total costs of VVIR pacing would range from $8,331-13,286. Based on the proportion of pulse generator models implanted in patients in the United States, the maximum cost differential to the health care system is approximately $424 million/year comparing the devices with the shortest and greatest longevities. Thus, pulse generator longevity may significantly influence the long-term costs of pacing. Patient survival and pulse generator system longevity should be considered when selecting the appropriate pacing system for the individual patient.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03159.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pulse generator
24
generator longevity
16
long-term costs
16
replacement rates
16
costs pacing
16
pulse generators
12
20-year follow-up
12
follow-up period
12
costs
11
longevity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!