Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
An open, randomized trial was performed to determine the optimal dosage schedule with regard to the efficacy and safety of cyclosporin in severe atopic dermatitis. The study also provided clinical experience with regard to the efficacy and safety of long-term cyclosporin treatment. During a 2-month dose-finding period, 78 patients with severe, long-standing atopic dermatitis received cyclosporin at a dose of either 5 mg/kg per day, decreasing to 3 mg/kg per day (Group A), or 3 mg/kg per day, increasing to 5 mg/kg per day (Group B), Patients were maintained on their optimal dose for a further 10 months. Patients in Group A showed a significantly greater improvement in efficacy parameters over the first 2 weeks than with patients in Group B, but as the dose was decreased in Group A and increased in Group B, these differences were minimized. After 1 year, cyclosporin showed an efficacy of 59.8% in Group A and 51.7% in Group B, assessed by a severity score. Assessed in terms of an area score, these figures were 48.7% and 40%, respectively. Cyclosporin demonstrated a good safety profile during long-term treatment and was generally well tolerated. The lower starting dosage was not associated with higher dropout rates. This study showed no differences in efficacy or adverse events between the two dosage schedules in long-term treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1996.tb00704.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!