Impact of MRI on a knee arthroscopy waiting list.

Ann R Coll Surg Engl

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport.

Published: September 1996

As part of a waiting list initiative, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were arranged for 69 patients waiting for knee arthroscopy. All patients had a clinical diagnosis of a meniscal tear. With 11 non-attenders, 58 scans were performed. Of the patients scanned, 35 had demonstrable meniscal tears, and five patients had other pathology on their scans. All patients were reviewed clinically after their scans, and 24 patients were removed from the waiting list. After a further 9 months, only one of the 24 patients removed had been re-listed for therapeutic arthroscopy. This initiative proved a cost-effective method of reducing waiting times for knee arthroscopy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2502922PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

knee arthroscopy
12
waiting list
12
scans patients
8
patients removed
8
patients
7
waiting
5
impact mri
4
mri knee
4
arthroscopy
4
arthroscopy waiting
4

Similar Publications

Background: The number of meniscal repairs being completed each year is increasing; however, the optimal, cost-effective postoperative assessment to determine the success or failure of a meniscal repair is not well known.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the clinical examination testing that correlates with objective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or second-look arthroscopy (SLA) findings to determine an optimal clinical workup for assessing postoperative meniscal repair healing. It was hypothesized that specific clinical tests would correlate with meniscal repairs that did not heal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Review of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

J Hip Preserv Surg

December 2024

Hip and Knee Adult Reconstruction Department, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra, Calzada México-Xochimilco No. 289 Colonia Arenal de Guadalupe Delegación, Tlalpan C.P., Ciudad de México 14389, México.

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a common condition of the hip that can cause significant damage to the joint, leading to degeneration and osteoarthritis. FAIS constitutes an abnormal and dynamic contact between the femoral head-neck junction and the acetabular rim, resulting from altered bone morphology at one or both sites. Repetitive trauma at the site of impingement generates progressive damage to the acetabular labrum, chondrolabral junction, and articular cartilage.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[What should be considered in the case of previous operations or injections prior to hip and knee replacement?].

Orthopadie (Heidelb)

January 2025

Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.

Background: Patients who have had prior injections, surgeries such as arthroscopies, and have existing osteosynthetic implants in the hip and knee have an increased risk of periprosthetic infections when undergoing hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Osteosynthesis: For patients with osteosynthetic implants in the knee joint, a two-stage procedure (implant removal followed by TKA) is recommended based on the available literature and the high colonization rates. A two-stage procedure is also recommended for patients with hip implants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Micro-fragmented adipose tissue is emerging as a promising option for the treatment of various diseases including knee osteoarthritis (OA), though clinical trials are often limited by short follow-up periods. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of an arthroscopic debridement followed by a single injection of micro-fragmented adipose tissue in patients affected by knee OA.

Methods: From 2016 to 2020, patients affected by knee OA were enroled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: The increased rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears has led to a greater number of revisions. Revision surgery can be performed in one or two stages. Single-stage revision ACL reconstruction (ssRACLR) may be performed when prior tunnels can be re-used or bypassed whereas a two-stage procedure is indicated when bone grafting of dilated tunnels prior to revision is necessary.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!