Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The feasibility of using the same slide repeatedly for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments was systematically evaluated by applying standard procedures and various combinations of direct- and indirect-labeled probes to slides from patients with hematologic malignancies. Specific and distinct hybridization signals along with weak background signals and chromosome morphology of good to moderate quality could be obtained in up to three experiments performed consecutively on the same slide. Signals related to biotin- or digoxigenin-labeled probes applied in previous hybridizations were still visible with variable intensity, but interpretation problems that may result from this signal noise can be avoided by using adequate probes, detection systems and fluorochromes, and sequence of experiments.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199608)16:4<261::AID-GCC6>3.0.CO;2-W | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!