A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Proximal tubular lithium/plasma concentration ratio depends on tubular fluid flow rate. | LitMetric

Proximal tubular lithium/plasma concentration ratio depends on tubular fluid flow rate.

Acta Physiol Scand

Department of Medical Physiology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Published: February 1996

Previous studies have given slightly different values of proximal tubular fluid/plasma lithium concentration ratios (TF/P)Li. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the technique of tubular fluid collection by micropuncture might contribute to this difference. Early distal and late proximal tubular fluid was collected by micropuncture during recording of early proximal hydrostatic pressure with varying pressures applied to the collection pipette. Distal fluid collection with 2-3 mmHg suction was unable to influence distal flow, proximal tubular pressure, nephron filtration rate (SNGFR), (TF/P)Li or (TF/P)Na significantly, as compared with values obtained without suction. In contrast, during late proximal collections, tubular pressure could be controlled. Within the range 2 mmHg below to 6 mmHg above free flow pressure maintained during collection, proximal flow rate varied from 9 to 44 nL min-1. (TF/P)Li was positively and significantly correlated to late proximal flow rate (P < 0.005, r = 0.65), independent of tubular pressure. (TF/P)Na was 1.03 and independent of flow rate and pressure. With collection adjusted to a late proximal flow of 24 nL min-1. (TF/P)Li would be about 1.15. At the more physiological flow rate of 12-14 nL min-1, (TF/P)Li was not significantly different from 1.00. It is concluded that proximal Li transport is distinct from Na transport and lags behind Na and water transfer only when flow rate is increased above normal. The result emphasizes the importance of the micropuncture fluid collection technique for estimates of proximal (TF/P)Li.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-201X.1996.460166000.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

flow rate
24
proximal tubular
16
late proximal
16
tubular fluid
12
fluid collection
12
tubular pressure
12
proximal flow
12
min-1 tf/pli
12
proximal
11
flow
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!