Background: Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a form of nutrition that can be life-saving, but its use has inherent risks and it is expensive. Nutrition support teams have been shown to reduce both the rate of complications and excessive use of PN.

Methods: Criteria were established to evaluate the appropriateness of PN use in a 487-bed community teaching hospital. A prospective study of 50 consecutive patients, who received either central or peripheral PN, was conducted.

Results: The 50 patients received 469 days of PN. We found that 233 (49.7%) of the 469 days of PN were avoidable. This resulted in the creation of a formal approval process that required prior approval by a physician-directed multidisciplinary advisory committee before PN could be instituted. The amount of PN subsequently decreased from 500 patient days of PN per month to less than 100.

Conclusions: This study supports the idea that inappropriate use of PN can be reduced by physician education plus the continuing oversight of a physician-directed multidisciplinary advisory group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0148607196020004272DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

parenteral nutrition
8
teaching hospital
8
patients received
8
469 days
8
physician-directed multidisciplinary
8
multidisciplinary advisory
8
reducing inappropriate
4
inappropriate parenteral
4
nutrition
4
nutrition acute
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!