Use of antioxidant supplements in the treatment of human oral leukoplakia.

An increasing public awareness of antioxidants may prompt a patient's request to be treated without surgery if a leukoplakic lesion is discovered. However, surgical excision remains the treatment of choice for oral leukoplakia. The use of antioxidant supplements has shown some promise, but the predictability of success remains uncertain and long-term results are unavailable. Before the decision to use any antioxidant is made, it is critical to obtain a histopathologic diagnosis of the lesion. When dealing with a lesion diagnosed as hyperkeratosis, it may be appropriate to choose an antioxidant that may take some time for clinical improvement to occur. However, as the grade of epithelial dysplasia becomes more severe, consideration must be given to the possibility of malignant transformation during antioxidant treatment. We do not recommend the use of antioxidant supplements in the treatment of any carcinoma. The therapeutic use of antioxidant supplements outside of clinical trials conducted at academic medical centers should be done with considerable caution by practitioners in private practice. It should be emphasized that in these clinical trial patients were seen at frequent intervals to monitor their progress and to intervene if there was a noticeable deterioration in the clinical appearance of the lesion. In spite of the uncertainty with respect to antioxidant treatment, there are circumstances in which it should be considered. Recurrence after surgical excision when there is little reason to believe that a second surgical excision would be any more successful is an ideal candidate. Also, patients with widespread leukoplakia that involves a large area of the oral mucosa might be suitable for treatment with antioxidants, as well as patients who have extensive medical problems that make them surgical risks. The choice of which antioxidant(s) to use is complex because thus far there is no combination that is superior to the others. Beta-carotene with ascorbic acid or alpha-tocopherol is attractive because of a lack of side effects, but the range in reported values for lesion improvement has been broad and the clinical improvement typically takes several months. Clinical response with 13-cRA is faster but requires baseline and periodic serologic testing, as well as close monitoring for side effects. In those circumstances in which time is an important consideration, 13-cRA might be useful because clinical improvement can be evaluated within a matter of weeks as compared with beta-carotene. The group from M.D. Anderson Hospital has shown the value of an induction dose of 13-cRA that is followed by a lower maintenance dose. Unfortunately, the problem of recurrence after discontinuation of 13-cRA is quite common. One aspect that has not been evaluated is the combination of conventional surgical excision and the administration of postoperative antioxidants. This would have the obvious advantage of conventional treatment of surgery together with the possible protective effect of the antioxidants. Although this is an attractive hypothesis, we do not know of any studies that have proven this to be beneficial.