Patient orientations were measured for 49 patients treated in the abdomen, chest, and pelvic regions over the course of 20 months. Setup errors were determined using a curve-matching graphical interface to compare digitized port films to digitized simulation films. Data representing both "initial patient setup" and "patient setup at treatment" are presented and compared. Data were sorted by anatomic area and analyzed both at the population level and on a patient-by-patient basis. For each population, setup errors were observed to be primarily random, with population standard deviations of 5-6 mm for each of three translations and 2-3 degrees for each of two rotations. Rotations about the patients' inferior-superior axes were not measured. For each site, correlations between translations and/or rotations were small. The results are consistent with those from previous studies. The data set is among the largest collected to date.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0958-3947(96)00022-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

setup errors
12
port films
8
measurement patient
4
setup
4
patient setup
4
errors port
4
films computer-aided
4
computer-aided graphical
4
graphical alignment
4
alignment tool
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!