A study of 43 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting was conducted in order to compare pre-operative expectation of pain severity and duration to actual postoperative experience. As judged by linear visual analogue scores, patients expected more pain than they experienced (p = 0.0359). For the majority of patients, pain duration was less than expected. Eighty-four per cent of patients reported that their pain was better or the same as expected. Ninety-five per cent of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with postoperative analgesia. The authors conclude that, although the standard of postoperative analgesia after coronary artery bypass grafting remains objectively poor (the median postoperative pain score was 4 on a 10 cm linear visual analogue pain score), patients are usually satisfied with their pain relief. The authors suggest that this may be related to patients' pre-operative overestimation of postoperative pain severity. The authors caution against giving patients unrealistic expectations of the quality of postoperative analgesia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07887.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

postoperative pain
12
coronary artery
12
artery bypass
12
bypass grafting
12
postoperative analgesia
12
pain
8
pain severity
8
linear visual
8
visual analogue
8
cent patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!