A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Endometrial stromal sarcoma with focal smooth muscle differentiation: recurrence after 17 years: a follow-up report with discussion of the nomenclature. | LitMetric

In 1977, a case report was published describing a 28-year-old women with an endometrial stromal tumor that showed foci of myogenic differentiation. The term "stromomyoma" was introduced to encompass both this type of neoplasm as well as "uterine neoplasms resembling ovarian sex-cord tumors" (UTROSCTs). More than 17 years later, the tumor recurred, involving the right ovary, sigmoid colon, small bowel, abdominal wall and omentum. The histologic and electron microscopic similarities between the recurrent tumor and the primary neoplasm were confirmed. Applying the recent classification and diagnostic criteria of endometrial mesenchymal neoplasms, we have concluded that this tumor was a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGSS). The formerly proposed term "stromomyoma" implies a benign tumor, in contrast to the obviously malignant nature of this particular tumor. Focal myogenic differentiation of LGSS is not an uncommon finding and does not warrant a separate diagnostic or prognostic entity. UTROSCTs and endometrial stromal sarcomas are two separate diagnostic entities, and combining them under an inclusive terminology is not appropriate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004347-199604000-00013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endometrial stromal
16
stromal sarcoma
8
myogenic differentiation
8
term "stromomyoma"
8
separate diagnostic
8
tumor
6
endometrial
5
sarcoma focal
4
focal smooth
4
smooth muscle
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!