The impact of wearing gloves on surface contamination and on the incidence of percutaneous injury were prospectively compared for two 4-mo periods in a single anesthesia department. Period I was immediately prior to the institution of mandatory glove wearing, and Period II followed a 1-mo adjustment period of mandatory glove use. Recording of all needlestick and other percutaneous injuries was performed on an ongoing basis, and incident reporting was actively and regularly solicited. During the final week of each period, 12 specific sites at each of nine anesthetizing locations were tested for occult blood. The incidence of needlestick injury was 0.28% for Period I versus 0.10% for Period II (P = 0.10) and the incidence for all percutaneous injuries was 0.60% for Period I and 0.27% for Period II (P = 0.06). If the one needlestick that occurred during noncompliance with gloving during Period II is eliminated, then there was a significant reduction in both needlestick and overall percutaneous injury (P < 0.05). Of 109 operating room sites, 42.2% were contaminated after Period I versus 31.2% after Period II (P = 0.07). The implementation of a mandatory glove use policy was associated with nonsignificant trends toward reduction in the incidence of needlestick and other percutaneous injury and in the level of surface contamination in the anesthesia workplace. Compliance with glove use resulted in a significant reduction in needlestick injury and overall percutaneous injuries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199609000-00033DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

needlestick percutaneous
16
percutaneous injury
16
surface contamination
12
mandatory glove
12
percutaneous injuries
12
period
11
wearing gloves
8
operating room
8
incidence percutaneous
8
incidence needlestick
8

Similar Publications

Background: Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a lethal acute viral zoonosis with a case fatality rate of 5-50%. Due to the potential of human-to human transmission of the disease, healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of occupational exposure to CCHF virus. Little is known about CCHF virus route of transmission and risks in Iranian HCWs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Needlestick injuries (NSIs) represent a significant occupational health risk in healthcare settings. These injuries, caused by contaminated sharps such as needles, vials, and scalpel blades, can lead to percutaneous exposure to infectious materials. Despite the severity of NSIs, they often go unreported, highlighting a critical gap in occupational safety protocols.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Needle Stick Injury: A Decade Retrospection Among Health Care Workers in a Tertiary Care Center.

Asia Pac J Public Health

January 2024

Department of Microbiology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Chengalpattu, India.

Needle stick injury (NSI) is a common incidence in a health care facility which can have a great impact on the psychological status of a health care worker (HCW). In the present study, over a decade, 76 incidents of NSI were reported. Nurses (47.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Blood-borne pathogens (BBPs) are infectious microorganisms that are found in human blood and can cause diseases in humans. Health care workers such as physicians, surgeons, nurses, dentists, dental students, dental assistants, laboratory technicians, personnel handling infectious waste, and other health care employees are at increased risk of exposure to these pathogens. Percutaneous injuries from needles or other sharp objects are the major sources of BBPs in the workplace.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!