Objective: To determine if student performance during the third-year clerkship is influenced by the order of departmental rotation.

Study Design: In this retrospective, descriptive study, the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) scores, departmental examination grade (DE) and final block grade (FG) were stratified into six segments based on the order of block time in obstetrics-gynecology, pediatrics, psychiatry, internal medicine, surgery and family medicine. Consistency was validated by comparing these performance criteria from 1988 to 1992.

Results: When all six clerkships were assessed by year, there was no uniform trend of improved performance over time. In the obstetrics-gynecology block, however, NBME scores and FGs were highest for students assigned to the fifth and sixth rotation as compared to the first two groups (P < .02). No such trend was noted with the departmental written examination. In surgery, DE and FG were always lower in the first rotation (P = .0001). Psychiatry DE scores were significantly higher on the second or third blocks as compared to the fifth and sixth rotation positions (P < .001). Students had a higher FG in pediatrics when the sixth position was compared to the second block (P = .02), but the DE grades and NBME scores were not altered by rotational schema. In family medicine and internal medicine, no effect of rotation was noted.

Conclusion: Third-year clerks tended to have higher NBME scores and FGs in obstetrics-gynecology if they selected this rotation later in the academic year. Surgery DEs and FGs were lowest if selected first in the academic year. There was no similar trend in other nonsurgical specialties. These data suggest that prior clinical rotations positively influence student performance in obstetrics-gynecology.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nbme scores
16
student performance
8
time obstetrics-gynecology
8
internal medicine
8
family medicine
8
scores fgs
8
sixth rotation
8
academic year
8
performance
5
scores
5

Similar Publications

Objective: The authors aimed to determine if medical students' self-assessment of abilities and performance differed by gender during the psychiatry clerkship and if these differences were reflected objectively in test scores or clinical evaluations from educators.

Methods: Data from mid-clerkship self-assessments completed during the psychiatry core clerkship were reviewed from two classes of medical students. Students rated their performance on 14 items across five domains: knowledge/clinical reasoning, differential diagnosis, data presentation, studying skills, and teamwork as "below," "at," or "above expected level.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Medical school exams, like those by the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) and the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), assess essential knowledge and skills for safe patient care, essential for student advancement and securing competitive residencies. Understanding the correlation between exam scores and medical school performance, as well as identifying trends among high scorers, provides valuable insights for both medical students and educators. This review examines the link between study resources and NBME exam scores, as well as psychological factors influencing these outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Since the elimination of numerical scoring of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1, the perceived importance of USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores in residency placement has increased. It is known that socioeconomic status (SES) and other demographic factors can be barriers to success in standardized assessment, but few recent studies report the relationship between student demographics, including SES, with Step 2 CK scores in the context of exam practice material access and usage. In this study, we investigated predictors of Step 2 CK success across two years at one institution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Plastic Surgery Common Application (PSCA) was introduced in the 2020-2021 integrated plastic surgery match cycle. We investigated the accuracy of medical student-reported quantitative metrics in the PSCA.

Methods: Quantifiable data from 1 year of PSCA applications were compared between matched and unmatched students.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction/background: Peer-led teaching sessions (PLTS) supplement conventional medical education, allowing students to share knowledge effectively. PLTS have shown significant academic benefits for student instructors. However, the impact on attendees, especially concerning NBME-style examinations, remains underexplored.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!