Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Adequate dose coverage of the target volume of head and neck cancer patients can be difficult to achieve with lateral opposing fields when the patient's neck is short and the disease involves the lower cervical region. Rotation of the couch away from the side of the gantry, such that the beams are angled towards the inferior aspect of the patient, can result in a better dose distribution. However, if the neck separation is large, unacceptable dose inhomogeneities will still exist. The conventional approach in these situations is to treat with parallel opposed lateral fields junctioned with anterior/posterior opposed low neck fields. We present a variation on the couch rotation technique as an alternative. Asymmetric jaws and half-wedged fields are used to obtain a homogeneous dose within an inferiorly extended target volume. The advantages of this technique are a simple set up and the capability of adding spinal cord shielding without shielding midline primary tumour.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0958-3947(95)02009-8 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!