[Evaluation of ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume using one-dimensional and two-dimensional echocardiography].

Med Pregl

Klinika za kardiologiju, Institut za kardiovaskularne bolesti, Sremska Kamenica, Medicinski fakultet, Novi Sad.

Published: August 1996

A group of 30 healthy persons and 120 coronary patients were investigated by one and two-dimensional echocardiography and digital subtraction angiography. End-diastolic volume and ejection fraction were estimated. Patients with coronary disease had greater volumes than healthy persons and smaller ejection fraction as well. The correlation of the given values showed that data gathered by two-dimensional echocardiography have greater coefficient in comparison to digital subtraction angiography (end-diastolic volume index r = 0.86, ejectional fraction r = 0.88, p < 0.01) than the same data estimated by one-dimensional technique. Two-dimensional echocardiography is a reliable noninvasive method for evaluation of these significant indicators of left ventricle function.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ejection fraction
12
end-diastolic volume
12
two-dimensional echocardiography
12
healthy persons
8
digital subtraction
8
subtraction angiography
8
angiography end-diastolic
8
[evaluation ejection
4
fraction
4
fraction end-diastolic
4

Similar Publications

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Triglyceride glucose index (Tyg), a convenient evaluation variable for insulin resistance, has shown associations with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, studies on the Tyg index's predictive value for adverse prognosis in patients with AF without diabetes are lacking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mitochondrial Dysfunction in HFpEF: Potential Interventions Through Exercise.

J Cardiovasc Transl Res

January 2025

Cardiac Regeneration and Ageing Lab, Institute of Geriatrics (Shanghai University), Affiliated Nantong Hospital of Shanghai University (The Sixth People's Hospital of Nantong), School of Medicine, Shanghai University, Nantong, 226011, China.

HFpEF is a prevalent and complex type of heart failure. The concurrent presence of conditions such as obesity, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia significantly increase the risk of developing HFpEF. Mitochondria, often referred to as the powerhouses of the cell, are crucial in maintaining cellular functions, including ATP production, intracellular Ca regulation, reactive oxygen species generation and clearance, and the regulation of apoptosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Left atrial shunting devices: why, what, how, and… when?

Heart Fail Rev

January 2025

Department of Cardiology, San Luca Hospital, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.

Left atrial (LA) hypertension is central in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) in general and of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in particular. Despite approved treatments, a number of HF patients continue experiencing disabling symptoms due to LA hypertension, causing pulmonary congestion, pulmonary hypertension, and right heart dysfunction, at rest and/or during exercise. LA decompression therapies, i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study investigated the correlation between quantitative echocardiographic characteristics within 3 days of birth and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and its severity in preterm infants. A retrospective study was conducted on 168 preterm infants with a gestational age of < 34 weeks. Patients were categorized into NEC and non-NEC groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The benefit of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with Impella (Abiomed, Inc, Danvers, MA) for patients undergoing non-emergent, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) is unclear and currently the subject of a large randomized clinical trial (RCT), PROTECT IV. While contemporary registry data from PROTECT III demonstrated improvement of outcomes with Impella when compared with historical data (PROTECT II), there is lack of direct comparison to the HR-PCI cohort that did not receive Impella support.

Methods: We retrospectively identified patients from our institution meeting PROTECT III inclusion criteria (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <35% with unprotected left main or last remaining vessel or LVEF <30% undergoing multivessel PCI), and compared this group (NonIMP) to the published outcomes data from the PROTECT III registry (IMP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!