A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A single positive prostate biopsy in six does not predict a low-volume prostate tumour. | LitMetric

Objective: To evaluate whether a single positive prostate biopsy in six systematic transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsies is predictive of a small tumour volume in a subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen.

Patients And Methods: Of 158 patients submitted to RP for T1-T2 prostate cancer, 15.2% had one positive biopsy. The rate of positive margins (M+) and extra-capsular involvement (C+) were assessed on the RP specimen in those with one positive biopsy (group I) and in those diagnosed by more than one positive biopsy (group II). The percentage of those with postoperative biological progression (P+), having a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level > 0.1 ng/mL, was evaluated in both groups. The Gleason scores in biopsies and specimens were also compared. Fifteen patients diagnosed by a single positive biopsy were management conservatively.

Results: The percentage of patients who were categorized C+, M+ and P+ was 29.2, 16.7 and 26% in group I and 70, 46.5 and 49.5%, respectively, in group II. All patients with < 10% of the biopsy core length invaded by cancer had intracapsular (P2) disease, whereas if all the core length was invaded by tumour, all patients had extracapsular (P3) disease. The Gleason scores for biopsy cores and whole specimens were identical in 38.7% of the cases; the Gleason score was underestimated on biopsy in 48.4% of cases. In the group treated conservatively, nine of 15 patients were in biological progression, with a mean follow-up of 22 months.

Conclusion: A single positive needle-biopsy in six systematic TRUS-guided prostate biopsies is not predictive of low-volume prostate cancer on an individual basis and does not guarantee a favourable outcome after RP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.98619.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

single positive
16
positive biopsy
16
biopsy
9
positive prostate
8
prostate biopsy
8
low-volume prostate
8
biopsies predictive
8
prostate cancer
8
biopsy group
8
biological progression
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!