White-coat hypertension and cardiovascular risk.

J Cardiovasc Risk

Internal Medicine and Hypertension Center, University of Palermo, Italy.

Published: December 1995

Objective: To compare cardiovascular risk in white-coat hypertensives, normotensives and established hypertensives.

Methods: We studied 61 hypertensive individuals, 27 of whom were white-coat hypertensives, and 35 normotensives. All subjects underwent 24 h noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and Doppler echocardiographic examination of the heart; urine was tested for microalbuminuria and the fundi of the eyes examined for retinopathy.

Results: The 24 h as well as the day- and night-time mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was slightly but significantly higher in white-coat hypertensives than in normotensives; no significant difference was observed in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between these groups. In white-coat hypertensives, 24 h SBP and DBP were lower than in established hypertensives (P < 0.001). The echocardiographic study showed higher values of posterior wall thickness, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), and ventricular septum thickness (P < 0.05) in white-coat hypertensives than in normotensives; fractional shortening and ejection fraction were similar. The E:A ratio, obtained from the Doppler study, was lower in white-coat hypertensives than in normotensives (1.14 +/- 0.3 versus 1.24 +/- 0.25; P < 0.05). LVMI values were smaller in white-coat hypertensives than in established hypertensives (P < 0.05), and both ejection fraction and fractional shortening were similar in the two groups. Among white-coat hypertensives, eight out of 27 showed hypertensive retinal damage; microalbuminuria values were similar to those obtained in normotensives.

Conclusions: The results of this cross-sectional and therefore limited study lead us to hypothesize that white-coat hypertensives are at higher risk than normotensives and lower risk than established hypertensives for developing cardiovascular damage.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

white-coat hypertensives
36
hypertensives normotensives
20
hypertensives
12
blood pressure
12
established hypertensives
12
white-coat
10
cardiovascular risk
8
groups white-coat
8
fractional shortening
8
ejection fraction
8

Similar Publications

Background: Hypertension is a leading cause of premature mortality and morbidity. Recent guidelines advocate for out-of-office blood pressure monitoring, including ambulatory and home BP monitoring, to better identify hypertension phenotypes like masked hypertension, white coat hypertension, and sustained hypertension. However, clinical inertia persists due to a lack of robust evidence on the effectiveness of screening these phenotypes and their association with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement devices, such as ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and home BP monitoring (HBPM), enhance the accuracy and reliability of BP readings, detecting white-coat and masked hypertension. The American Heart Association (AHA) advises confirming hypertension diagnoses with ABPM to prevent overdiagnosis, emphasizing the importance of precise out-of-office diagnostic tools. This study aimed to 1) explore the prevalence of ABPM and HBPM use prior to hypertension diagnosis; 2) assess the adherence to AHA recommendations regarding ABPM utilization; and 3) investigate the association between patient characteristics and out-of-office BP monitoring practices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: White coat effect (WCE) is a phenomenon linked to increased cardiovascular risk, where office blood pressure readings exceed home or ambulatory measurements. Excess weight and elevated blood pressure or glucose are associated with WCE in type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study compared dapagliflozin and glibenclamide on WCE in T2D patients under equivalent blood pressure and glucose control.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Parent and Primary Care Clinician Perceptions About Pediatric Hypertension.

JAMA Netw Open

December 2024

Division of Behavioral Health, Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, Delaware.

Importance: Despite published guidelines and a prevalence of pediatric hypertension of approximately 3%, less than 25% of affected children are identified, with 60% not receiving any intervention despite detection. Understanding the knowledge and perceptions of parents or caregivers and health care teams is crucial to identify factors that may contribute to these unacceptably low detection rates.

Objective: To examine the knowledge and perceptions of parents and health care teams regarding pediatric hypertension to identify common themes contributing to low hypertension detection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Blood pressure (BP) control in haemodialysis (HD) patients is essential. Peri-dialytic BP levels do not accurately diagnose hypertension or predict the cardiovascular (CV) mortality.

Methods: In this study, we recruited 43 adult patients who had been on chronic HD for ≥3 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!