Two methods of sperm preparation for in vitro fertilization were compared: the swim-up technique vs. the migration-sedimentation technique. The study comprised fresh semen samples obtained from 25 couples treated in the In Vitro Fertilization Unit. Oocytes aspirated in a single cycle were divided into two groups, each inseminated by sperm prepared by one of these techniques. Motility, degree of motility, and normal morphology were improved by both methods. The improvement was greater when the migration-sedimentation technique was applied. However, fertilization rate was significantly higher after the swim-up technique. In order to clarify this contradiction, an additional group of 26 semen samples was divided and then prepared by the swim-up or migration-sedimentation techniques. Sperm quality was examined up to 72 h after separation. Compared with the swim-up technique, sperm characteristics were better after separation by the migration-sedimentation technique. However, this difference abated after 24 h. The better results of the swim-up technique in the "survival experiment' may explain its improved performance in in vitro fertilization, despite lower separation capacity. Thus, the migration-sedimentation technique is not recommended for sperm preparation in in vitro fertilization.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.1996.tb02750.x | DOI Listing |
Syst Biol Reprod Med
December 2025
College of Medicine, Department of Basic Sciences, Roseman University of Health Sciences, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Cryopreservation, the use of very low temperatures to preserve structurally intact living cells and tissues, has seen exponential growth in the field of fertilization (IVF). In the last decade, cryopreservation of embryos and freeze-all protocols have become an essential aspect and a prerequisite for a successful IVF outcome. Moreover, vitrification, which is a fast and safe cryopreservation method, has proved to be an effective choice for cryopreserving gametes and embryos.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJBRA Assist Reprod
January 2025
Clínica Originare, Medicina Reprodutiva, São Paulo, Brazil.
Endometriosis is a chronic disease that affects around 10% of reproductive age women worldwide and a common cause of infertility. One of its manifestations is ovarian endometriomas, which are present in 17-44% of endometriosis patients. Endometriomas can impair fertility by mechanical stretching and local inflammation, promoting oxidative stress in the surrounding ovarian cortex that could lead to apoptosis and necrosis of early follicles.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Obstet Gynecol Scand
January 2025
Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Introduction: To report the progress of the human living uterus transplant research project in Singapore.
Material And Methods: The uterus transplant research project began in 2012 with a collaboration between the Swedish and Singapore teams. Ethics approval was obtained from the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board, the SingHealth Transplant and the Singapore General Hospital Biomedical Ethics Committee to perform 5 uterus transplant procedures in a collaborative multi-site research study at the Singapore General Hospital.
Health Sci Rep
January 2025
Healthcare Management Program, School of Social Sciences Hellenic Open University Patras Greece.
Background And Aims: In recent years, In Vitro fertilization (IVF) science has grown by leaps and bounds in the field of assisted reproduction, helping millions of couples worldwide. The aim of this study is to examine the extent to which infertile women are willing to pay for IVF services in Greece.
Methods: Through the distribution of questionnaires, willingness to pay (WTP) is recorded according to IVF success rates, and the relationship between WTP and the respondents' demographic characteristics is analyzed.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
January 2025
Reproductive Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Background: One potential cause of implantation failure is abnormal endometrial receptivity, and how to objectively evaluate endometrial receptivity has been a matter of great concern. Endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA), a next-generation sequencing-based test that assesses endometrial gene expression, may be valuable in predicting endometrial receptivity, but whether ERA improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is currently controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of ERA on pregnancy outcomes in patients with RIF.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!