Background: We compared the 5 mm and 6 mm ablation zones of the Summit Omnimed in the treatment of myopia in 2 eyes of the same patient.

Method: One hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients with myopia less than 6 diopters (D) has one eye treated with a 5 mm ablation zone and the other eye with a 6 mm ablation zone. Minimum follow up was 6 months.

Results: Follow-up was achieved in 101 patients of the total 124. In the 5 mm group 79% achieved 20/30 uncorrected visual acuity while 68% of the 6 mm group achieved 20/30 acuity. Ninety-seven percent of all eyes in both groups achieved 20/40. Some of the disparity between the 20/30 acuity in the two groups is that initial corrections with the 6 mm zones were conservative. Corneal haze was less in the 6 mm group; subjectively they had better night vision.

Conclusions: Both lasers with the different ablation zones gave reasonably predictable correction of myopia of up to -6 D. Overcorrection and corneal haze were less in the 6 mm group and night vision was subjectively better.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-19960201-16DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ablation zones
12
ablation zone
8
achieved 20/30
8
20/30 acuity
8
corneal haze
8
haze group
8
subjectively better
8
ablation
5
comparison photorefractive
4
photorefractive keratectomy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!