Purpose: We examined further whether the injury or method of management is responsible for impotence and incontinence after immediate realignment of prostato-membranous urethral disruptions.

Materials And Methods: A total of 20 patients with complete urethral disruptions treated with immediate realignment (group 1) was compared to 12 with partial or complete injuries treated with retrograde catheterization alone (group 2). Followup status was obtained by patient questionnaire or telephone interview.

Results: Of the patients 83% in group 1 and 80% in group 2 are continent, and 76% and 70%, respectively, regained erections suitable for sexual intercourse.

Conclusions: The results suggest that impotence and incontinence in this setting are the result of the injury and not of attempts at immediate surgical management.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

impotence incontinence
12
incontinence realignment
8
result injury
8
realignment posterior
4
posterior urethral
4
urethral trauma
4
trauma result
4
injury management?
4
management? purpose
4
purpose examined
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!