Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists.

Radiology

Russell Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Published: February 1996

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of hemodialysis catheters placed by interventional radiologists with those placed by surgeons.

Materials And Methods: The outcomes were retrospectively analyzed of 237 hemodialysis catheters placed in 140 patients by a radiology service from January 1991 through December 1992. Follow-up data were available for 222 catheters (94%). Catheter secondary patency and freedom from infection were analyzed statistically and by means of life-table analysis.

Results: Pneumothorax occurred after the placement of six catheters (2.5%); in two patients, a chest tube was required for decompression. Other short-term complications included air embolism with no clinical sequelae (two procedures) and prolonged oozing from the tunnel (two procedures). Long-term complications included infection and catheter failure. Infection occurred in 26 patients (18%) with 32 catheters (14%) and resulted in removal of 25 catheters. Ninety-three catheters (42%) failed, and 63 catheters (28%) were removed because of failure.

Conclusion: Hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists do not have a higher rate of complications or failure than catheters placed by surgeons.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596851DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hemodialysis catheters
16
catheters
11
catheters radiologists
8
complications included
8
outcome tunneled
4
hemodialysis
4
tunneled hemodialysis
4
radiologists purpose
4
purpose compare
4
compare outcomes
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!