Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of three-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) angiography performed with cardiac synchronization in the assessment of renal arteries.

Materials And Methods: Thirty-eight patients (24 men, 14 women) underwent three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography without gating and with systolic and diastolic gating. Conventional angiography was used as the standard of reference.

Results: The sensitivity for the detection of all stenoses (> 0%) was 93% with systolic, 92% with diastolic, and 77% without gating. However, there was no difference between the three techniques in the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant stenoses (> 50%). The mean arterial length depicted was significantly better with diastolic gating than with either of the other techniques (P < .0001). Vascular disease was significantly overestimated with systolic gating relative to estimation without (P = .030) or with diastolic (P = .008) gating.

Conclusion: Three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography provides good image quality and enables assessment of renovascular disease. Cardiac gating has limited improvement of these results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596848DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

three-dimensional phase-contrast
16
diastolic gating
12
phase-contrast angiography
12
renovascular disease
8
systolic diastolic
8
gating
7
diastolic
5
angiography
5
disease patients
4
patients hypertension
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!