Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Because of their high oxygen-carrying capability and small particle size, it has been suggested that perfluorochemical emulsions may be useful to reduce reperfusion injury after coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion. We tested the ability of Fluosol and a more concentrated perfluorochemical emulsion (perflubron) to decrease infarct size in anesthetized rabbits undergoing 30 min of coronary occlusion and 4 h of reperfusion. All rabbits were ventilated with 100% oxygen. Treatment was begun at 25 min of coronary occlusion, 5 min before reperfusion. Rabbits were randomized to receive saline (10 ml/kg, n = 15), Fluosol (30 ml/kg, n = 15), or a perflubron emulsion (10 ml/kg, n = 16), or the perflubron emulsion vehicle (10 ml/kg, n = 15). Collateral blood flow during occlusion was measured with radioactive microspheres. The size of the ischemic region at risk was determined by in vivo injection of blue dye and infarct size by in vitro tetrazolium staining. We found that all groups were equally ischemic during occlusion, and that risk zone sizes were comparable. Heart rate and systemic arterial pressure were also similar among groups. Infarct size expressed as a percentage of the risk zone was 30 +/- 4% in saline-treated rabbits, 27 +/- 4% in Fluosol-treated rabbits, and 21 +/- 4% and 21 +/- 3% in perflubron emulsion and perflubron emulsion vehicle treated rabbits, respectively. There was a trend for both perflubron emulsion and perflubron emulsion vehicle groups to have smaller infarcts; however, neither perfluorocarbon emulsion nor the emulsion vehicle significantly reduced infarct size compared with saline treatment. Thus, at the doses used in this study neither Fluosol nor perflubron emulsion, when given just before reperfusion, significantly reduced infarct size in this rabbit model.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00788502 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!