This study was designed to compare the accessibility of particular anatomical sites in the middle ear cleft in five canal wall-up and five canal wall-down temporal bone dissections, using 0 and 70 degree otoendoscopes and the microscope. In all five canal wall-up dissections, otoendoscopy gave good visualization of all sites of the middle ear cleft whereas microscopy failed to give adequate visualization of the sinus tympani and protympanum. In all five canal wall-down dissections otoendoscopy again allowed good visualization of all sites whereas microscopy did not permit visualization of the sinus tympani. It is well known that residual cholesteatoma is most frequently found in the sinus tympani, therefore this makes the otoendoscope an essential adjunct to the microscope in canal wall-up and canal wall-down surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1995.tb00074.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

canal wall-up
16
canal wall-down
16
middle ear
12
ear cleft
12
wall-up canal
12
sinus tympani
12
canal
8
cleft canal
8
wall-down temporal
8
temporal bone
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!