INTRODUCTION OF THE TROUGH:PEAK RATIO: The mean antihypertensive effect of a drug, measured just before the next dose in a multiple-dose regimen, is generally used as a criterion for approval by regulatory agencies. However, for many short-acting drugs very high doses may be required to maintain some antihypertensive activity at the end of the dosing interval. This may lead to an excessive reduction in blood pressure at the time of peak drug effect. In order to avoid unnecessarily large doses, regulatory agencies have introduced a new standard, the trough:peak ratio, which may be 50-60% but should should ideally be higher. BENEFITS OF HIGH TROUGH:PEAK RATIO: A high trough:peak ratio indicates a long duration of action. This may provide a better risk:benefit ratio compared to shorter acting antihypertensive agents by giving optimal therapeutic coverage for 24 h or even longer. Greater benefit may be gained from better control of overnight blood pressure, especially in the early morning hours when both a steep rise in blood pressure and a higher rate of cardiovascular events have been observed. Large swings in blood pressure may occur when the peak is too high in relation to the trough, increasing blood pressure variability, which may in turn increase target organ damage. A high trough:peak ratio may protect the patient against drug-induced blood pressure fluctuations. It may also produce fewer adverse effects as the blood pressure may fall further and the onset of action may be more gradual. This, together with an effective single daily dose, may increase patient compliance. Furthermore, an antihypertensive effect that lasts more than 24 h protects the patient against a rapid loss of blood pressure control when a dose is omitted or delayed. TROUGH:PEAK RATIO OF AVAILABLE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS: We performed a literature survey to evaluate the practical relevance of the trough:peak ratio and to determine how it might help in the choice of antihypertensive agents. The results suggested that not all single daily doses of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium antagonists had a trough:peak ratio of > 50%. We conclude that specially designed, prospective clinical trials should be conducted to address this issue.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199508001-00018 | DOI Listing |
Curr Med Res Opin
January 2015
Vinh Medical University, Vinh City, Nghe An , Vietnam.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of lercanidipine and amlodipine in the treatment of hypertensive patients with acute cerebral ischemic stroke.
Research Design And Methods: An open label, controlled, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted on 104 hypertensive patients (blood pressure [BP] >130/80 mmHg) diagnosed with ischemic stroke. Enrolled subjects were randomly assigned to a 4 week treatment with lercanidipine 20 mg/day or amlodipine 10 mg/day.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi
September 2013
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of aranidipine enteric-coated capsules on 24 h blood pressure and blood pressure variability (BPV) in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
Methods: This was an open clinical trial with 2 weeks of placebo run-in period. A total of 74 patients with blood pressure (140-180/95-110 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther
March 2013
Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are the first-line therapy for the treatment of hypertension. However, not all ACEIs are equal. Delapril is a nonsulfhydryl ACEI with unique properties.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHypertens Res
November 2012
Department of Nephrology, Karadeniz Technical University, School of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey.
In addition to high blood pressure (BP), BP variability has recently also been shown to increase cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of valsartan/amlodipine and a valsartan- and amlodipine-free drug combination on 24-h BPV. A total of 85 patients aged 18 or older and with no exclusion criteria were enrolled; of the 85 patients, 43 used the FDCs valsartan/amlodipine (160/10 mg) and 42 used a free drug combination of valsartan 160 mg and amlodipine 10 mg.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cardiovasc Pharmacol
July 2012
Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Health, Cardiovascular Institute and FuWai Hospital, Key Laboratory of Clinical Trial Research in Cardiovascular Drugs, Beijing, China.
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled study, conducted in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a 2-week washout period, 236 eligible patients were randomly to receive aranidipine 5-10 mg/d (n = 118) or amlodipine 5-10 mg/d (n = 118) for 10 weeks. The blood pressure and heart rate were evaluated in outpatient clinics, and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed in 24 patients in each group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!