Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In order to investigate whether or not the summating potential (SP) and the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) are due to related cochlear non-linearities, their behavior was studied in the guinea pig after intracochlear perfusion with ouabain and subsequent rinsing. The SP was evoked with either 4 or 8 kHz tone bursts, and the 2f1-f2 DPOAE was evoked with simultaneous presentations of 6.6 and 8 kHz continuous tones. After ouabain perfusion, DPOAE was dramatically reduced while the SP underwent only a small reduction. After rinsing out the ouabain with artificial perilymph, the DPOAE showed partial recovery while the SP displayed a large and long-lasting increase when compared to its a initial value. These results suggest that the non-linear processes giving rise to the SP and DPOAE are not identical.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00167310 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!