A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Rhinovirus enters but does not replicate inside monocytes and airway macrophages. | LitMetric

Potential interactions between rhinovirus (RV) and both the airway macrophage and its precursor cell, the blood monocyte, were investigated in terms of direct binding, intracellular replication, cell survival, and cytokine production. When HeLa cell suspensions are inoculated with RV as a positive control, virus titer increases by 100-fold in the first 24 h, confirming intracellular replication. In contrast, RV titer in monocyte and macrophage suspensions steadily decreased. Despite a lack of productive RV replication, cell-associated RV RNA was detectable using a biotin-labeled cDNA probe as early as 6 h after inoculation. Direct binding of RV16 to macrophages was confirmed using radiolabeled virus, although preincubation with anti-ICAM-1 mAb did not block this interaction. Synthesis of RV RNA, as indicated by [3H]uridine incorporation in actinomycin D-treated cells, was detected in HeLa cells but not macrophages, suggesting that the viral RNA detected inside macrophages was from input virus and was not newly synthesized. RV inoculation did not adversely affect monocyte or macrophage viability. Finally, RV caused macrophage activation, as indicated by the induction of TNF-alpha secretion. These in vitro findings suggest that macrophages interact with major group RV in vivo, and raise the possibility that there is a second cellular receptor for these viruses. Furthermore, macrophages do not serve as permissive host cells during in vivo RV infection, but instead may be active participants in anti-RV immunity and RV-induced airway inflammation.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

direct binding
8
intracellular replication
8
monocyte macrophage
8
macrophages
6
rhinovirus enters
4
enters replicate
4
replicate inside
4
inside monocytes
4
monocytes airway
4
airway macrophages
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!