Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We performed a clinical study examining 60 volunteers with stable shoulder joints randomized to two groups. In group 1 we injected 5 ml lidocaine intra-articularly. In group 2 we injected 5 ml saline with 5 ml contrast dye the same way. After the injection we measured the amount of passive anteroposterior translation that occurred during anterior and posterior drawer tests and the amount of inferior subluxation during downward stress. We documented the extent of the passive glenohumeral translation using ultrasound. We had no complications related to the intra-articular injection or to the stability measurement. After the injection neither group had significant pain, and the patients were not apprehensive about the ensuing stability test. In group 1 (lidocaine) anteroposterior translation of 13.2 +/- 6.3 mm was seen in the anterior and posterior drawer test, whereas in group 2 (no lidocaine) the anteroposterior translation was only 6.8 +/- 3.2 mm. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). With downward stress during the sulcus test the distance between the acromion and the humeral head increased by 5.6 mm (+/- 3.2) in group 1 and by 2.7 mm (+/- 2.1) in group 2. This difference was also statistically significant (P < 0.05). Clinical consequences: Taking our preliminary findings into account, the capsule of the glenohumeral joint seems to have proprioceptive capability. Nerve fibres and mechanoreceptors seem to be localized in the capsule tissue, being part of a physiological feedback mechanism. If our conclusions proprioceptive capability. Nerve fibres and mechanoreceptors seem to be localized in the capsule tissue, being part of a physiological feedback mechanism.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01565457 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!