Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The endometrium was studied by morphometry in 34 healthy women before and after one year's use of an IUD releasing levonorgestrel at a rate 20 micrograms/24 hr (LNG-IUD-20). The effect was compared with that of an IUD releasing 2 micrograms levonorgestrel/24 hr (LNG-IUD-2). The appearance of suppressed endometrial proliferative activity and increased inflammatory reaction was similar in the two experimental groups, suggesting that the morphological alterations were independent of the LNG dosage. The result of this study, combined with clinical data, suggests that LNG-IUD-20 could replace LNG-IUD-2 without any additional side effects. The efficacy of LNG-IUD-20 is also likely to last for a longer period than the LNG-IUD-2.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(95)00125-t | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!