Superiority of balloon occlusion arteriography to reactive hyperemic arteriography in visualization of distal lower limb vessels.

Balloon occlusion arteriography was performed in 38 lower limbs; reactive hyperemic arteriography was also performed in 16 of these limbs. To assess the safety and utility of this technique the balloon occlusion arteriograms of all 38 patients were reviewed retrospectively by a vascular surgeon and vascular radiologist who were unaware of the patient's identity and ultimate treatment. After the arteriograms were reviewed and the outflow vessels identified, a decision was made regarding operability and optimal recipient vessel for distal bypass. Twenty-two of the 38 patients underwent balloon occlusion arteriography only, and 21/22 (95.5%) of these patients only had studies deemed adequate for surgical planning. Twelve of the 16 (75%) patients underwent both reactive hyperemic arteriography and balloon occlusion arteriography; potential distal outflow vessels not seen on reactive hyperemic arteriograms were observed on balloon occlusion arteriograms. In only 4/16 (25%) patients the balloon occlusion arteriograms did not yield additional information. No complications were associated with this technique. Approximately 8.5 g of iodine per run is used for balloon occlusion arteriography compared with approximately 37 g of iodine per run for reactive hyperemic arteriography. Balloon occlusion arteriography is a safe and accurate adjunctive technique that can be used when identification of lower limb vessels is critical.