Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Our purpose was to determine the incidence and segmental distribution of intraluminal disease in the arm veins of patients in whom saphenous vein was unavailable or inadequate for bypass, determine whether angioscopic evaluation and directed interventions can upgrade the quality of arm vein conduit and improve early graft patency, and describe the angioscopic technique of in situ retrograde arm vein inspection.
Methods: Retrospective review of 109 infrainguinal arm vein bypass grafts in 104 patients performed with intraoperative angioscopic vein preparation and monitoring between August 1989 and March 1992 was undertaken. Four additional arm veins harvested were discarded because of diffuse disease.
Results: Intraluminal disease was noted in 71 (62.8%) of 113 arm veins, "webs" in 61 (54%), vein sclerosis in 25 (22.1%), localized stenosis in 11 (9.7%), and thrombus in 7 (6.2%). Intraluminal disease was most common in the cephalic (forearm 49.2%; arm 35.1%) and median cubital (33.3%) veins and least common in the basilic vein (11.7%). Eighty-three angioscopically directed interventions in 68 of 71 abnormal arm veins resulted in upgraded vein conduit quality in 47 (66.1%) of 71. Primary patency (< 30 days) was 99 (90.8%) of the 109 grafts, 85 (95.5%) of 89 grafts with normal or upgraded quality conduits, and 14 (70%) of 20 inferior-quality grafts (p = 0.0024). These differences persisted through 1 year by life-table analysis, (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Not only is the routine use of the angioscope in arm vein bypass grafting a sensitive technique to detect the intraluminal diseases so prevalent in arm veins but it can also direct endoluminal and surgical interventions that upgrade the quality of the vein conduit and improve early graft patency.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.1993.46530 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!