Objective: To compare outpatient referral patterns in fundholding and non-fundholding practices before and after the implementation of the NHS reforms in April 1991.
Design: Prospective collection of data on general practitioners' referrals to specialist outpatient clinics between June 1990 and March 1992 and detailed comparison of two time periods: October 1990 to March 1991 (phase 1) and October 1991 to March 1992 (phase 2).
Setting: 10 fundholding practices and six non-fundholding practices in the Oxford region.
Subjects: Patients referred to consultant outpatient clinics.
Results: After implementation of the NHS reforms there was no change in the proportion of referrals from the two groups of practices which crossed district boundaries. Both groups of practices increased their referral rates in phase 2 of the study, the fundholders from 107.3 per 1000 patients per annum (95% confidence interval 106 to 109) to 111.4 (110 to 113) and the non-fundholders from 95.0 (93 to 97) to 112.0 (110 to 114). In phase 2 there was no difference in overall standardised referral rates between fundholders and non-fundholders. Just over 20% of referrals went to private clinics in phase 1. By phase 2 this proportion had reduced by 2.2% (1.0% to 3.4%) among the fundholders and by 2.7% (1.2% to 4.2%) among the non-fundholders.
Conclusions: Referral patterns among fundholders and non-fundholders were strikingly similar after the implementation of the NHS reforms. There was no evidence that fundholding was encouraging a shift from specialist to general practice care or that budgetary pressures were affecting general practitioners' referral behaviour.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1676519 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6875.433 | DOI Listing |
Gac Sanit
January 2025
Pharmacy Service, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Advisory Committee on the Financing of Pharmaceutical (CAPF), Spain.
This paper describes the reforms recommended by the Advisory Committee on the Financing of Pharmaceuticals (CAPF) for the National Health System (NHS) of Spain from 2019 to 2024 for the drug pricing and reimbursement process, to integrate economic evaluations and improve efficiency and sustainability. The CAPF has proposed a three-phase reform of the economic evaluation (EE) and budget impact analysis (BIA) processes. The first phase involves the mandatory submission of EE and BIA by applicants for new drugs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Eat Disord
January 2025
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
The treatment gap for eating disorders varies significantly across healthcare systems owing to structural, cultural, and systemic barriers. A recent systematic review by Ali et al. highlighted this disparity, with treatment rates ranging from 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Gen Intern Med
January 2025
Brown University, 222 Richmond St., Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
On April 22, 2024, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced new staffing mandates for long-term care (LTC) facilities in an effort to improve care quality in nursing homes (NHs). The guidelines require a minimum of 3.48 h of daily care per resident, including 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Appl Res Intellect Disabil
January 2025
Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Liverpool, UK.
Background: The Welfare Reform Act (2012) has been criticised for harming claimants, particularly through functional assessments. Although many people with intellectual disabilities in the UK receive welfare benefits, their experiences of undergoing functional assessments are under-researched.
Method: Eight participants with intellectual disabilities were interviewed about experiences of welfare assessment.
Health Policy
December 2024
University of Bologna and Dondena Centre-Bocconi University, Italy. Electronic address:
This paper discusses a reform recently implemented in the Italian National Health Service, aimed at adding some socio-economic indicators to the criteria adopted for allocating healthcare funding to Regions. The reform is based on international experience in healthcare financing in decentralized settings and provides a case study of special interest since Italy is a country with significant territorial disparities and severe budget constraints. The paper first discusses the long-standing debate between Italian Regions which led to the reform.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!