Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Although hepatic replacement has emerged as the most definitive treatment for patients with chronic liver disease with variceal hemorrhage, a significant number of patients remain better served by porto-systemic shunting. Historically, for those patients with coexisting ascites requiring side-to-side shunting, synthetic or autogenous graft material has been interposed between the portal vein and inferior vena cava when the two veins could not be brought into direct apposition. The porto-renal shunt, described in 1964 but rarely used, allows shunt construction without the use of synthetic materials. Six patients who recently underwent porto-renal shunting are described in order to clarify the indications for the use of this technique and to describe the technical aspects of its construction.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80838-4 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!