Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
After percutaneous transpenile or retrograde venous occlusion for the treatment of a cavernous leak, the clinical results were correlated with cavernosometric flow measurements in 27 patients. In 15 patients, venous occlusion led to a reduction of the maintenance flow: in patients who showed improvement there was an average reduction of 30 ml/min, in those without improvement or deterioration it averaged 0.3 or 13 ml/min respectively. In 7 patients there was increased flow (up to +21 ml/min). One of these patients showed improved erectile function; the remaining 6 showed no change as was also the case in 5 other patients who had no change in cavernosometric measurements. Our findings suggest a multifactorial cause of the venous leaks.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1032602 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!