A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Differential effects of calcium channel antagonists in rat normal and skinned fundus. | LitMetric

CaCl2 (0.1-25 mM, in K(+)-depolarized tissues), KCl (10-112 mM) and acetylcholine (1 nM-1 mM) produced concentration-dependent contractions of rat isolated fundus. Nifedipine (0.01-500 mcM), diltiazem (0.01-100 mcM) and flunarizine (10-500 mcM) each produced a concentration-related inhibition of the log concentration-effect curve for CaCl2. The rank order of potencies of these antagonists, measured as the IC50 against Ca2+ (25 mM)-induced contraction of depolarized fundus, was nifedipine (1.9 mcM) = diltiazem (2.5 mcM) >> flunarizine (660 mcM). Diltiazem depressed KCl-induced contraction with an effectiveness and potency similar to that displayed against CaCl2 but nifedipine and flunarizine were less effective against contractions to KCl compared to CaCl2. Flunarizine (500 mc), but not the other antagonists tested, depressed Ca2+ (20 mc)-evoked contraction of skinned rat fundus preparations. It is concluded that distinct differences exist between the Ca2+ channel antagonists examined. The action of nifedipine and diltiazem is restricted to the plasmalemma, whereas flunarizine also acts on the intracellular contractile apparatus.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mcm diltiazem
12
channel antagonists
8
fundus nifedipine
8
mcm flunarizine
8
mcm
6
flunarizine
5
differential effects
4
effects calcium
4
calcium channel
4
antagonists
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!