A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Aortic valve replacement using a continuous suture technique. | LitMetric

The continuous suture technique has been proposed as an alternate method for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Advantages include a decreased ischemic and bypass time. Despite reports of a low incidence of perivalvular leak, wide use of the continuous suture technique has not been adopted. This report reviews our experience with the continuous suture technique. From January 1984 through November 1991, 181 consecutive patients underwent AVR using the continuous suture technique. The mean age was 61 years (range 6 to 88 years). Diagnoses included pure aortic stenosis (AS) in 41%, aortic insufficiency (AI) in 31%, and a combination of AS and AI in 28%. Fifty-six patients underwent isolated AVR and 125 underwent AVR combined with other procedures. The overall early mortality was 5.5%. Early mortality for isolated AVR was 0% (0/56) and was 8.0% (10/125) for those undergoing concomitant procedures. Late mortality was 4.7% in a mean follow-up of 30 months (range 1 to 86 months). The incidence of perivalvular leak was 2.3% (4/171 operative survivors). Perivalvular leak was mild in two, and moderate in two; none required reoperation. Perivalvular leak developed only in patients whose suture line was not reinforced with glutaraldehyde treated pericardium. The continuous suture technique is a quick and effective method for AVR and results in a low incidence of perivalvular leak.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.1993.tb00394.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

continuous suture
24
suture technique
24
perivalvular leak
20
incidence perivalvular
12
aortic valve
8
valve replacement
8
low incidence
8
patients underwent
8
underwent avr
8
isolated avr
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!