A total of 110 patients with upper ureteral calculi was admitted to a prospective trial and randomly allocated to 2 groups: 1 group treated with in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and 1 group treated with ureteral manipulation before ESWL. All patients had solitary upper ureteral calculi without urinary infection. The stones had to be smaller than 1 cm. and located more than 2 cm. lateral to the spine. ESWL was performed with the Dornier HM3 lithotriptor. One patient in the in situ ESWL group had to be treated twice because disintegration of the stone was insufficient after the initial treatment session. All other patients underwent only 1 treatment session. Because 16 patients were lost to followup, 94 were evaluable for the analysis of immediate and long-term results. For disintegration of the stones in situ ESWL needed significantly more shock waves (1,844 +/- 639 versus 1,297 +/- 473, p < 0.001) and a higher voltage (19.5 +/- 1.4 versus 18.7 +/- 0.9 kv., p < 0.001). There were no severe complications in either treatment group. At 3 months 44 of 46 patients (96%) after in situ ESWL and 45 of 48 (94%) after ureteral manipulation before ESWL were free of stones. In view of these results it is suggested that uncomplicated upper ureteral calculi (as defined previously) should be treated first with in situ ESWL, thus, avoiding an invasive procedure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35623-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upper ureteral
16
ureteral calculi
16
situ eswl
16
group treated
12
extracorporeal shock
8
shock wave
8
wave lithotripsy
8
treated situ
8
eswl
8
eswl group
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: To describe the incidence and mortality of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) from 2002-2020 using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, which contains data from the entire Korean population.

Materials And Methods: Reimbursement records for 43,255 patients diagnosed with primary UTUC (according to the International Classification of Disease 10th revision code C65 and C66) between 2002-2020 were retrieved. The study period was split into four: period I (2002-2005), period II (2006-2010), period III (2011-2015), and period IV (2016-2020).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The global increase in urolithiasis prevalence has led to a shift towards minimally invasive procedures, such as retrograde intrarenal surgery, supported by advancements in laser technologies for lithotripsy. Pulsed lasers, particularly the holmium YAG and the newer thulium fiber laser, have significantly transformed the management of upper urinary tract stones. However, the use of high-power lasers in these procedures introduces risks of heat-related injury.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To test whether race/ethnicity affects stage or grade distribution at upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) diagnosis.

Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database 2004-2020, UTUC patients were identified. Multivariable logistic regression models tested for the association between race/ethnicity and stage as well as grade at diagnosis according to renal pelvis vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU).

Methods: 90 patients who received LRNU at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between January 2018 and July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 43 in the ERAS group and 47 in the pre-ERAS group. The clinical features, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), and hospital expenditures of the two groups were compared via t-test, Mann-Whitney test, and Chi-square test.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: We aimed to assess the stone free rate of flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURL) in upper urinary tract stones (UUTS) >20 mm and the risk of complications from ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage.

Methods: This is a prospective randomized clinical trial that included patients with UUTS larger than 20 mm who underwent FURL after randomization into two groups: group A (UAS) and group B (non-UAS). Data were collected for patients' demographics, stone parameters, operative and postoperative complications, and the outcome of FURL regarding stone-free rate (SFR) and perioperative complications, with a 6-month follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!