This prospective study of 335 patients with penetrating injuries of the neck examined the decision whether to operate or observe according to a protocol based mainly on physical examination. Emergency angiography was performed in only three patients. Sixty-six patients (20 per cent) were subjected to emergency operation because of signs and symptoms suggestive of significant injury (60 patients) or because of positive investigations (six). The remaining 269 patients (80 per cent) were selected for non-operative management. Two of these patients (0.7 per cent) required elective operation during the initial hospital stay. No deaths occurred in patients treated conservatively. Some 192 (72 per cent) of observed patients were available for early follow-up and 111 (42 per cent) for late follow-up. No significant complications were found. Physical examination is a reliable method for detecting significant injuries following penetrating neck trauma. Emergency angiography is rarely necessary.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800801213DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

physical examination
12
patients cent
12
patients
9
management patients
8
patients penetrating
8
penetrating injuries
8
injuries neck
8
emergency angiography
8
cent
5
examination selective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!