Data of clinical examination, exercise testing and exercise radionuclide angiography in 102 patients referred for assessment of chest pain was included in a logistic regression to optimize the diagnosis of coronary artery disease with coronary arteriography as the reference investigation. None of the patients had other cardiac problems or previous myocardial infarction. In the absence of symptoms, exercise testing was continued until at least 80% of the theoretical maximal heart rate was attained. Each patient was characterized by the value of the logistic function or probability of coronary artery disease. A threshold value corresponding to 80% sensitivity of ROC graphs was determined. The significant variables were: a clinical variable--the type of chest pain as assessed by the clinical history; two radionuclide angiographic variables--the ejection fraction at peak effort and the corrected variation of ejection fraction between rest and stress, that is not taking into account possible decreases at the last increment of exercise. Coronary patients can be identified with an 80% sensitivity and 77% specificity on these criteria. This specificity is greater than that obtained by clinical examination and exercise testing alone (65%). Exercise radionuclide angiography may therefore reduce the number of unnecessary coronary arteriographies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000175969 | DOI Listing |
NEJM Evid
February 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
AbstractBecause symptoms of cardiopulmonary disease often occur with exertion, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has a unique role in the assessment of patient symptoms, disease severity, prognosis, and response to therapy. In addition to the evaluation of cardiovascular and pulmonary physiology, CPET provides an assessment of the interaction of the cardiovascular and pulmonary systems with the musculoskeletal, nervous, and hematological systems. In this article, we review key CPET variables, protocols, and clinical indications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUS Cardiol
December 2024
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Tangier, Abdelmalek Essaadi University Tangier, Morocco.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a crucial tool for assessing cardiorespiratory function, providing invaluable insights into individual physiological capacities. This review explores the clinical indications of CPET, its contraindications, as well as a comprehensive protocol for its execution. Additionally, it highlights key parameters measured during CPET and their interpretation, as well as the role of CPET in the prescription of aerobic training in cardiac rehabilitation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCJC Open
January 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Background: Supervised exercise programs improve walking impairment and quality of life (QoL) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, such programs are underutilized, due to their limited accessibility. A feasible and effective exercise program is needed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Cardiol
December 2024
Department of Respiratory Medicine, King George's Medical University Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a long-term condition characterised by increased resistance to blood flow in the pulmonary circulation. The disease has a progressive course and is associated with a poor prognosis. Without treatment, PAH is associated with mortality in <3 years.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPeerJ
January 2025
Department of Physical Education, Sport and Recreation, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Temuco, Chile.
Objective: This study aimed to determine the association between changes in lactate production and levels of physical activity in a group of healthy young adults in response to two squat training protocols.
Material And Methods: Twenty-nine students majoring in Sports Science willingly participated in this study. Participants visited the lab four times within a two-week period, ensuring at least 48 h between visits.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!