The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Equipment failure: an analysis of 2000 incident reports.

Anaesth Intensive Care

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Adelaide, Australia.

Published: October 1993

Of the first 2000 incidents reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study, 177 (9%) were due to "pure" equipment failure according to pre-defined criteria. Of these 107 (60%) involved anaesthetic equipment, 42 (24%) involved monitors, 17 (10%) other theatre equipment and 11 (6%) the gas or electricity supply. Ninety-seven (55% of the 177) were potentially life-threatening; of these two-thirds would be detected by the array of monitors recommended by the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and all but 9 of the remainder would be handled by application of the crisis management algorithm recommended elsewhere in this symposium. Of the 9 remaining, 2 were electrical shock, 3 overheating of a humidifier or blood warmer, 2 the unavailability of a spare laryngoscope and 1 the consequence of a power failure. Meticulous adherence to the equipment checking and monitoring guidelines of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and application of a suitable crisis management algorithm should protect the patient from potentially life-threatening equipment failure in virtually all cases except electric shock, power failure and overheating of warming devices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0310057X9302100533DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

equipment failure
12
australian incident
8
incident monitoring
8
monitoring study
8
australian zealand
8
zealand college
8
college anaesthetists
8
crisis management
8
management algorithm
8
power failure
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!